Child Protection Guidance 2021

Appendices: Appendix F: Resources and references 230 National Guidance for Child Protection in Scotland 2021 Version 1.0 September 2021 References: Part 2B • Barnsdale L, Walker M Use and Impact of Family Group Conferencing. Scottish Executive/ University of Stirling 2007. pdf • Baginsky et al (2017) Evaluation of Signs of Safety in 10 pilots. Children’s Social Care Innovation Programme Evaluation Report 48. DoE safety/ • Biehal N, Cusworth L, Hooper J, Whincup H & Shapira M (2019) Pathways to Permanence for children who become looked after in Scotland. Insights for policymakers and practitioners. University of Stirling. Permanently Progressing? Building secure futures for children in Scotland. Stirling. • Broadhurst K, White S, Fish S, Munro E, Fletcher K, Lincoln H (2010) Ten pitfalls and how to avoid them. NSPCC. pitfalls-i nitial-assessments-report.pdf • Calder M, McKinnon M, Sneddon R (2012) National Risk Assessment Framework. Scottish Government. • CELCIS Protection Children Knowledge Bank: protecting-children/ • Child and Family Community Australia (2012) Is resilience still a useful concept when working with children and young people? Australian Institute of Family Studies publications/resilience-still-useful-concept-when-working-child/what-resilience • Children’s Hearings Scotland (2019) Practice and Procedure Manual. resources/hearings-and-area-support-team-operation/chs-practice-procedure-manual/ • Child Protection Committees Self-Evaluation CELCIS/CPC Scotland • Cusworth L, Biehal N, Whincup H, Grant M, Hennessy A (2019). Children looked after away from home aged five and under in Scotland: experiences, pathways and outcomes. University of Stirling. Children-looked-after-away-from-home-aged-five-and-under-in-Scotland-experiences,- pathways-and-outcomes.pdf • Department for Education (2017) Children’s Social Care Innovation Programme Evaluation Report 48. Evaluation of Signs of Safety in 10 Pilots. publications/signs- of-safety-practice-in-childrens-services-an-evaluation • Firmin C Contextual Safeguarding Network materials and resources: www. • Harnett P. et al. Capacity to Change in High-Risk Pregnant Women: A Pilot Study. Child Abuse Review Vol. 27: 72 –84 (2018) Published online 3 October • Johnson, R., Smith, E. and Fisher, H. (2015) Testing the reliability and validity of the Graded Care Profile version 2 (GCP2). London: NSPCC) • Lonne, B., Harries, M., Featherstone, B., Gray, M. (2016). Working Ethically in Child Protection. London: Routledge • Ingram J, Manole M (2019) Child Participation in Child Protection Processes • McKillop (2015) Family Group Conferencing – Scotland’s National Standards. Family Group Conferences – National Standards • McTier A (2019) Child Protection Committees’ Processes and Practices in Relation to Child Sexual Exploitation. Report of Child Protection Committee Survey CELCIS Protecting Children Team